- plant transfer is P
- controller transfer is C
- your input is t (before the summing point) and the output is y
Controller in the feedback path?
3 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
Matteo Manzini
el 2 de Nov. de 2020
Respondida: Mathieu NOE
el 3 de Nov. de 2020
What happens if the controller of a closed-loop system is placed in the feedback path before the summation point instead of bewtween the summation point and the plant to control?
Is it allowed to do so? If so, what are the main differences???
Thanks!
0 comentarios
Respuesta aceptada
Mathieu NOE
el 3 de Nov. de 2020
hello Matteo
both schemes are OK, they only differ for tracking performance
assuming :
for controller in the main path : tracking performance = y/t = C*P / (1 + C*P) , so you see the controller transfer is also in the numerator of the closed loop
for controller in the feedback path : tracking performance = y/t = P / (1 + C*P) , so you see the controller transfer is only in the denominator of the closed loop
for output perturbation rejection (that is assume y is corrupted by perturbation p ) , both schemes give exactly the same performance :
y/p = 1 / (1 + C*P)
one typical example of feedback is PID; usually we put the P and I action in the main path , but it is not recommended to put the D term here because we want to avoid to derive the input data, so the D term is located only in the feedback path - so damping applies only on the measured output and not on the input.
hope it helps !
0 comentarios
Más respuestas (0)
Ver también
Categorías
Más información sobre Classical Control Design en Help Center y File Exchange.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!