i want to implement this transformation formula on any image, give me code, links , tutorials related to it ?
Información
La pregunta está cerrada. Vuélvala a abrir para editarla o responderla.
Mostrar comentarios más antiguos
how i implement this formula on such kind of images friends plz help
3 comentarios
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Editada: Walter Roberson
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
Respuestas (3)
Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
0 votos
I don't know what x and y are. If they are coordinates then this t value does not depend on the image pixel intensities at all, which strikes me as strange.
10 comentarios
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Editada: Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
What is it? It sort of looks like some kind of image moment except for the fact that it doesn't depend on any image intensities. What happens if you just do it like it says, like :
n1 = sum(x .^ 2);
n2 = sum(y);
n3 = sum(x);
n4 = sum(x .* y);
numerator = n1*n2+n3*n4;
d1 = n*n1;
d2 = n3^2;
denominator = d1-d2;
t = numerator / denominator;
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
You're not answering my questions, and I don't know how to answer yours, especially when vital details are released in little bits and pieces over several posts. I still have no idea what you want to do, where you got that equation, why you used imtransform(), etc.
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
It looks like it gets returned from imtransform().
chitresh
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
The example on "Projective Transformation" in the help does that.
chitresh
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
I hope my code helped you. It does what you want, even though I don't understand what you want represents, or why you want it. Does this solve everything for you now?
Roger Stafford
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Editada: Roger Stafford
el 29 de Nov. de 2013
Chitresh, I can tell you what kind of mathematical problem your expression is a solution to. Let us have n x and y pairs
x = [x1,x2,x3,...,xn]
y = [y1,y2,y3,...,yn]
and suppose we want to find the line of regression through them - that is, to find constants a and b such that
sum((a*x+b-y).^2)
is a minimum. This is a least squares problem and the solution for the constant b is
b = (sum(x.^2)*sum(y)-sum(x)*sum(x.*y))/(n*sum(x.^2)-sum(x)^2)
which is precisely your expression.
I can only guess how this might apply to the fingerprint image you display. If the xi and yi pairs refer to pixel coordinates of the black areas, and if the coordinate origin is at the lower left corner of the image, then b would be the vertical distance above the bottom at the left side where the line of regression crosses. On the other hand if the origin is located in the center of the image, b would be the vertical distance above or below this origin where the regression line crosses a vertical line through that origin. I would have thought the expression for a would have at least as much significance in the image as with b, since it would give the slope of that line of regression.
There are probably several other possible meanings that the x and y pairs might possess with regard to the image. I think that is a puzzle you will have to crack. Note that when you do solve your puzzle, the above expression shows you how to implement it in matlab in one line.
4 comentarios
chitresh
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
OK, so x and y are coordinates of minutiae. But what does t in your formula represent? If it has something to do with fitting a line, how does that make sense? The minutiae don't lie in a line.
chitresh
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
Image Analyst
el 30 de Nov. de 2013
Sorry, no.
La pregunta está cerrada.
Productos
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!


