Borrar filtros
Borrar filtros

How to create function handle using random output

3 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Jacob Thompson
Jacob Thompson el 22 de Feb. de 2023
Comentada: Walter Roberson el 1 de Mzo. de 2023
Hi all,
I am trying to implement something called a "Tailored Randomized Block-MH" algorithm, which requires me to take a likelihood function, change a subset of parameters while fixing the others through the optimization step.
Suppose I have a function f([p,q,r,x,y,z]) and a randomization step tells me to hold [p,q,r] at [p_bar,q_bar,r_bar] fixed while changing [x,y,z]. I can type manually something like:
maximand = @(x) f([p_bar,q_bar,r_bar,[x_1,x_2,x_3])
how would I do something like this using just the output from the output of, say, randperm(3)?
  6 comentarios
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 23 de Feb. de 2023
Which specific optimizer are you using? Some of them make it easier than others.
Jacob Thompson
Jacob Thompson el 23 de Feb. de 2023
I usually use fminunc but anything capable of simulated annealing will work

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Respuestas (3)

Jan
Jan el 23 de Feb. de 2023
Maybe:
maximand = @(x) f([p_bar, q_bar, r_bar, x(randperm(3, 3))])
  2 comentarios
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 23 de Feb. de 2023
That potentially returns one of six different values, depending on which permutation occurs. It might possibly make sense to me to deliberately try all permutations of x, six calls to f, but I am having difficulty thinking of a context in which randomly selecting would be useful.
Jacob Thompson
Jacob Thompson el 23 de Feb. de 2023
That's not quite what I'm looking for. I don't want the order of variables to be randomized once we've already decided which parameters are fixed and which are allowed to vary to maximize the maximand, but rather I want to randomize the choice of which parameters to fix and which to vary in order to maximize the maximand.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.


Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson el 23 de Feb. de 2023
For fmincon and simulannealbnd the easiest way to handle this is to use the same function call in each case, but set the ub and lb the same for the entries that are to be fixed for this run.
For example,
rvars = sort(randperm(numel(UB),NumFixedVars));
fixedvals = LB(rvars) + rand(1,NumFixedVars) .* (UB(rvars) - LB(rvars));
LB(rvars) = fixedvals; UB(rvars) = fixedvals;
x0(rvars) = fixedvals;
[bestx, fvals, exitflag] = fmincon(fun, x0, A, b, Aeq, beq, LB, UB, nonlcon, opts);
This code picks random variable indices. Then it picks random values between the lower and upper bound for those variables, and sets the lower and upper bound to be the same for those variables, and proceeds to run the optimization.
You might, of course, have had completely different logic in mind as to how to choose the fixed values for the variables, so alter the fixedvals assignment as appropriate for your situation.

Jacob Thompson
Jacob Thompson el 1 de Mzo. de 2023
I'm quite certain that I figured this out, thanks for the help guys.
function liki = fmin(x,current,block)
% y = zeros(1,16);
noblock = setdiff(1:16,block);
y = zeros(size(current));
y(noblock) = current(noblock);
elements = length(block);
for i = 1:elements
y(block(i)) = x(i);
end
liki = -dsgeliki(y) - prior(y);
end

Categorías

Más información sobre Linear Least Squares en Help Center y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by