How to prevent overwriting in loop

Hi, I have the following loop. Does anyone know how to avoid the output to be overwritten in each iteration, and instead get x1, x2, ..., x5 as output?
N=5
T=5
for n=1:N
x=NaN*ones(T,1)
c=0.3
sigma=1
rho=0.98
x(1)=c/(1-rho)
for t=1:T
x(t+1)=c+rho*x(t)+sigma*randn(1)
end
end

 Respuesta aceptada

Adam
Adam el 9 de Abr. de 2015
Editada: Adam el 9 de Abr. de 2015
You can move a lot of that outside of your loop as a first step as follows ( never define constants in a loop ):
N = 5;
T = 5;
c = 0.3;
sigma = 1;
rho = 0.98;
x = NaN(T,1);
x(1) = c / ( 1 - rho );
for t = 1:T
x(t+1) = c+rho*x(t)+sigma*randn(1);
end
That is not the equivalent of what you did though because it isn't obvious what you are trying to do in the outer loop once all the constants get moved outside the loop.
If you want a 2-d array then you can, as a second step, create something like:
x = NaN(T,N);
randvals = randn(T-1,N);
x(1,:) = c / ( 1 - rho );
x(2:T,:) = c + rho * x(1,1) + sigma * randvals;
instead using a vectorised approach instead of a loop.

6 comentarios

lily
lily el 9 de Abr. de 2015
What I am trying to do is to simulate N sequences of a T steps AR(1) process. I am not too familiar with Monte Carlo simulations, so that is what I was trying to do in the outer loop. What I would like to get as output is N vectors of (T*1) dimension. At the moment, all I can get is one vector x with the values of the last iteration.
Adam
Adam el 9 de Abr. de 2015
Well, my solution should give what you want (although the first row will contain all the same values because it is based on a constant for each of the n simulations).
The only difference is that my result gives you an N * T array which is far better to work with in Matlab than N individual vectors.
Stephen23
Stephen23 el 9 de Abr. de 2015
@lily: you should use Adam's second solution, and learn how to use vectorized code effectively.
lily
lily el 10 de Abr. de 2015
I do understand the need for vectorisation, as what I have now is taking ages to compute, but I cannot get my head around how to transform my code. I tried applying the examples given on the Mathworks documentation page to my own code (see below) but I cannot get it to work.
N=1000
T=100
x=NaN*ones(T,N)
sigma=1
for n=1:N
x(1,n)=0
for t=2:T
x(t,n)=x(t-1,n)+sigma*randn(1)
end
end
plot(x)
Adam
Adam el 10 de Abr. de 2015
That looks sufficiently similar to your original that you should still be able to apply the vectorisation I gave above, with minor modifications possibly.
lily
lily el 10 de Abr. de 2015
OK I understand now. As you probably guessed, I am quite new to MATLAB and I'm struggling a fair deal. Anyway, it is working, thank you very much for your help.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (1)

Stephen23
Stephen23 el 10 de Abr. de 2015
Editada: Stephen23 el 11 de Abr. de 2015
Here is a fully vectorized version. First define the parameters:
N = 100;
T = 10;
sigma = 1;
Generate all random steps in an array S, then force the first row of S to be all zero, and finally use cumsum to get the "paths" of each column of S:
S = sigma*randn(T,N);
S(1,:) = 0;
x = cumsum(S,1);
Then plot it just like before:
plot(x)
to produce this figure:
This produces, accepting that the "random" steps are of course different, the same thing as what the loop does:

1 comentario

lily
lily el 10 de Abr. de 2015
Thank you very much Stephen, this really helps me understand what is going on.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Categorías

Más información sobre Loops and Conditional Statements en Centro de ayuda y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Preguntada:

el 9 de Abr. de 2015

Editada:

el 11 de Abr. de 2015

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by