Simulating the synchronous machine below, i am unable to model saturation without immediately creating a numerical instability. The data has been sourced from factory tests, and manufacturer calculated datasheet values where tests were not possible. Decreasing sample time from 25µs to 0.25µs improves stability, but creates unacceptable simulation times.
Characteristics of the data that i am aware of:
- OC saturation curve (from test data) does not intersect the declared 1pu operating point for excitation current @ nominal volts. Scaling the saturation data to fit (1,1) has not helped.
- X''d & X''q are more different (compared to each other) than anticipated
- Increasing the parasitic load on the machine from 5-15% improves stability, but then offsets the true operating point for the rest of the model.
SM.Rating.S = 1938e3;
SM.Rating.Vline = 690;
SM.Rating.F = 60;
SM.Rating.Poles = 4;
SM.Mech.gensetH = 0.8516;
SM.Imped_Std.Ra = 0.0054;
SM.Imped_Std.Xdst_RI = 13.7e-2;
SM.Imped_Std.Xdt_RI = 21.9e-2;
SM.Imped_Std.Xd_RI = 222e-2;
SM.Imped_Std.Xqst_RI = 18.4e-2;
SM.Imped_Std.Xq_RI = 113e-2;
SM.Imped_Std.X1 = 6.6e-2;
SM.TimeConsts.Tdst_RI = 0.017;
SM.TimeConsts.Tdt_RI = 0.267;
SM.TimeConsts.Tqst_RI = 0.018;
SM.base.Iexc = 0.85;
SM.SatData.If_OC_ST = [0.19 0.35 0.55 0.6 0.67 .72 .8 .89 .92 .98 1.09 1.31 1.61 2.52]/SM.base.Iexc;
SM.SatData.V_OC = [259 374 553 586 621 659 689 716 724 742 760 793 828 897]/SM.Rating.Vline;
My first post; so please advise if i can compose my questions better! Thanks
0 Comments
Sign in to comment.