the plot and the patch is totally different from same data, how to solve it?

for i = 1:length(trajectory)
    plot3(trajectory(i).Longitude, trajectory(i).Latitude, trajectory(i).Altitude)
    hold on
end

for i = 1: length(trajectory)
 
xptcl =  prctile(trajectory(i).Longitude,[2.5 97.5]);
yptcl =  prctile(trajectory(i).Latitude,[2.5 97.5]);
zptcl =  prctile(trajectory(i).Altitude,[2.5 97.5]);

    xptcl = [xptcl;];
    yptcl = [yptcl;];
    zptcl = [zptcl;];

    xl(i,:) = xptcl;
    yl(i,:) = yptcl;
    zl(i,:) = zptcl;
   
    patch([xptcl flip(xptcl)], [yptcl flip(yptcl)], [[1 1]*zptcl(1) [1 1]*zptcl(2)],'r', 'FaceAlpha',0.5)
    hold on
end


plot3(xl(:,1), yl(:,1), zl(:,1), '-k', 'LineWidth',2)
plot3(xl(:,1), yl(:,1), zl(:,2), '-k', 'LineWidth',2)
plot3(xl(:,2), yl(:,2), zl(:,1), '-k', 'LineWidth',2)
plot3(xl(:,2), yl(:,2), zl(:,2), '-k', 'LineWidth',2)
grid on 

view(45,30)

I wroted the code likt this above.

but it seems totally wrong.

the patch should be narrower than trajectory, because i set the range with percentile 2.5 and 97.5.

how can the patch be more bigger than the trajectory?

I thought at least the patch's size is as same as trajectory's size.

[dpb]

Only way anybody could tell anything here would be for you to attach .mat file containing the raw data...

[Walter Roberson]

We do not know that there is a connection between the values in the trajectory structure, compared to the x* y* z* variables

[dpb]

The plot appears they are related given shapes shown, but could be scaled differently, for example.