how to modify the variables for changing FOR loop to PARFOR loop??

6 views (last 30 days)
I have a code described here which takes lot of time to run on my 32 cores machine. I tried to use all cores by changing for loop by parfor loop. I get an error about in final_lmatrix which ccannot be classied.
CC = bwconncomp(B_fill_slice);
L = labelmatrix(CC);
numObjects = CC.NumObjects;
prev_regions = 0; %initialize
new_regions = numObjects;
iter = 1;
while ((new_regions - prev_regions)>0)
disp(new_regions - prev_regions);
prev_regions = new_regions;
new_num = 0;
final_lmatrix = zeros(r,c,p, 'uint8'); % preallocation
for n = 1:new_regions
region = (L==n);
l = water(region); %compute watershed and return labelmatrix
if (n~=1)
l = reassign_label(uint8(l),r,c,p,new_num);
final_lmatrix = l+final_lmatrix; %contains the updated label matrix to be used for the next iteration
new_num = max(final_lmatrix(:));
end %end for loop
new_regions = new_num;
L = final_lmatrix;
iter = iter+1;
end %end while loop
Rik on 25 Jul 2022
Every iteration should independent. That means you can only use n as an index. If you don't have memory issues, that means you should use final_lmatrix(:,:,:,n) inside the loop.

Sign in to comment.

Answers (2)

Jan on 25 Jul 2022
What is the bottleneck of your code? Use the profiler to find it. If it is the water() command, parallelize this command:
lArray = zeros(r,c,p, new_regions, 'uint8')
parfor n = 1:new_regions
lArray(:, :, :, n) = water(L == n);
Does this work? Then the re-assigning of the lables runs in a separate sequential loop, or you can create a more efficient method.
  1 Comment
Rizwan Khan
Rizwan Khan on 25 Jul 2022
Yes, water ( ) command is the bottleneck but issue I am getting with the function of re-assigning lables. We have to update the label numbers in the subsequest regions.
Purpose of reassign label function: I am applying my own watershed transform locally on the 3D image. Suppose region 1st has 5 labels numbering 1 to 5 and region 2nd has 3 labels which gives lables as 1 to 3 and therefore I ressign the lables to start as 6,7, and 8 to avoid overwriting and son on.

Sign in to comment.

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 25 Jul 2022
Edited: Bruno Luong on 25 Jul 2022
Could you try this inner loop (EDIT fix issue with 0 label):
final_lmatrix = 0;
parfor n = 1:new_regions
region = (L==n);
lbn = water(region); %compute watershed and return labelmatrix
m = max(lbn);
LUT = [0, (1-2*2^-n)+2^-n*((1:m)/m)];
lbn = LUT(lbn); % I don't know what is your reassign_label function does
final_lmatrix = final_lmatrix + lbn;
end %end for loop
[~,~,final_lmatrix] = unique(final_lmatrix);
final_lmatrix = final_lmatrix - 1;
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong on 25 Jul 2022
Edited: Bruno Luong on 25 Jul 2022
So it looks like your label is higher for n small (pushed up by later iterations).
I did the opposite since I didn't know the detail of your function.
It's really not hard to change to match your labeling convention.

Sign in to comment.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by