Inverse of a symmetric matrix consisting of submatrices is desired.

8 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
ayeser el 2 de Mzo. de 2024
Comentada: Walter Roberson el 9 de Mzo. de 2024
Inverse of a symmetric matrix consisting of submatrices is desired.
N(12x12) and its determinant are non-zero, B1(12x5), B1(12x4), C1(2x5) C1(2x4) are dimensional submatrices. Can someone inverse this matrix? T denotes transpose of matrix
N 0 B1 B2
0 0 C1 C2
B1T C1T 0 0
B2T C2T 0 0
14 comentariosMostrar 12 comentarios más antiguosOcultar 12 comentarios más antiguos
Torsten el 8 de Mzo. de 2024
Movida: John D'Errico el 9 de Mzo. de 2024
No, it's just the problem from above rephrased. And the reasons why it makes no sense trying to solve it symbolically are sufficiently explained.
Walter Roberson el 9 de Mzo. de 2024
Eventually, MATLAB crashed while trying to process the above A\B

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

John D'Errico el 4 de Mzo. de 2024
Editada: John D'Errico el 5 de Mzo. de 2024
This makes little sense as you write it, AND it will be essentially impossible to perform in MATLAB using symbolic tools. syms CANNOT compute (in a finite time, measured in our lifeltimes) matrix inverses for large matrices in fully symbolic form.
You say this:
N(12x12) and its determinant are non-zero, B1(12x5), B1(12x4), C1(2x5) C1(2x4)
First, we are not told what the B2 and C2 sizes are. I'll assume the second arrays you gave as B1 and C1 are actually B2 and C2.
I'll make that assumption then, and as a test case, I want to point out the result will be a full matrix in general. Just to give you a feeling, consider this example:
N = randn(12); N = N+N';
B1 = randn(12,5);C1 = randn(2,5);
B2 = randn(12,4); C2 = randn(2,4);
A = [N,zeros(12,2),B1,B2; ...
zeros(2,12),zeros(2,2),C1,C2; ...
B1',C1',zeros(5,5),zeros(5,4); ...
B2',C2',zeros(4,5),zeros(4,4)];
You can see the non-zeros in the A matrix here:
spy(A)
And see that inv(A) will be a full matrix, completely filled in.
spy(inv(A))
Can you compute the matrix inverse, using these block matrices? I suppose there is no reason why you could not just perform a simple Gaussian Elimination on those blocks, as long as the necessary elements will be non-singular. However, MATLAB does not have that capability, at least not today.
It might seem you could try. That is, just create a 4x4 symmetric matrix, with variables representing those blocks, then compute the symbolic inverse. The problem is, MATLAB would need to know that the matrix products in that result do NOT commute. And this is why the above scheme will fail. The symbolic toolbox will assume commutativity.
And if you try to generate the entire matrix as a symbolic 23x23 array where all elements are symbolic (not numeric) then the symbolic inverse will never terminate, as it would involve on the order of factorial(23) terms.
As such, your question cannot be solved using MATLAB. You would be best off just doing the linear algebra yourself. I expect it will get a bit nasty looking, but you could in theory survive. Just not using MATLAB.
0 comentariosMostrar -2 comentarios más antiguosOcultar -2 comentarios más antiguos

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (2)

Walter Roberson el 7 de Mzo. de 2024
N = symmatrix('N', [12 12]);
B1 = symmatrix('B1', [12,5]); C1 = symmatrix('C1', [2,5]);
B2 = symmatrix('B2', [12,4]); C2 = symmatrix('C2', [2,4]);
A = [N,zeros(12,2),B1,B2; ...
zeros(2,12),zeros(2,2),C1,C2; ...
B1',C1',zeros(5,5),zeros(5,4); ...
B2',C2',zeros(4,5),zeros(4,4)]
A =
invA = inv(A)
invA =
4 comentariosMostrar 2 comentarios más antiguosOcultar 2 comentarios más antiguos
Torsten el 7 de Mzo. de 2024
Editada: Torsten el 7 de Mzo. de 2024
MATLAB can't see it either.
It just writes that inv(A) = A^(-1) which doesn't help much.
Torsten el 7 de Mzo. de 2024
Editada: Torsten el 7 de Mzo. de 2024
You could split your matrix into a matrix of the form [A B;C D] where A is 12x12 (invertible), B is 12x11, C is 11x12 and D is 11x11 and apply
I don't know if this leads to anything useful.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Paul el 8 de Mzo. de 2024
Editada: Paul el 9 de Mzo. de 2024
I wasn't going to post this as it didn't seem like a useful answer, but, since @Torsten raised the idea of using the block matrix inversion formula ....
A = symmatrix('A',[12 12]);
B = symmatrix('B',[12 11]);
C = symmatrix('C',[11 12]);
D = symmatrix('D',[11 11]);
% M = [A B;C D]
invM = [ ...
inv(A) + inv(A)*B*inv(D-C*inv(A)*B)*C*inv(A) , -inv(A)*B*inv(D-C*inv(A)*B);
-(inv(D-C*inv(A)*B))*C*inv(A) , inv(D-C*inv(A)*B) ]
invM =
invM = subs(invM,C,B.')
invM =
N = symmatrix('N',[12 12]);
Z = symmatrix('Z',[12 2]);
B1 = symmatrix('B1', [12,5]); C1 = symmatrix('C1', [2,5]);
B2 = symmatrix('B2', [12,4]); C2 = symmatrix('C2', [2,4]);
invM = subs(invM,inv(A),inv(N))
invM =
Hmm, not all of the inv(A) terms are subbed with inv(N). Don't know what that's all about.
On my local installation of R2021b, the substitution worked the way I intended and thought it would.
I guess the workwaround would be to start the problem with N instead of A for the upper left block. Or just subs A for N (instead of their inverses).
invM = subs(invM,A,N)
invM =
invM = subs(invM,B,[Z B1 B2])
invM =
invM = subs(invM,D,[zeros(2) , C1 , C2;[C1';C2'],zeros(9)])
invM =
invM = subs(invM,Z,sym(zeros(12,2)))
invM =
At this point, I couldn't get much further. Coudn't even figure out how to subs in values for N, B1, B2, C1, and C2.
1 comentarioMostrar -1 comentarios más antiguosOcultar -1 comentarios más antiguos
ayeser el 9 de Mzo. de 2024
thanks

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Categorías

Más información sobre Number Theory en Help Center y File Exchange.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by