Borrar filtros
Borrar filtros

Using intlinprog to Minimize Combinations

1 visualización (últimos 30 días)
Jake Smith
Jake Smith el 7 de En. de 2019
Comentada: Alan Weiss el 7 de En. de 2019
I'm learning how to use intlinprog to solve a minimization problem. I have a series of paths that each connect two waypoints with distance values that need to be combined to minimize the overall distance of a route. 2 paths share a waypoint to make up a route. For example:
%distance for each path
p1 = 10;
p2 = 5;
p3 = 12;
p4 = 8;
%possible route combinations
routes = [p1 p2 0 0; p1 0 p3 0; p1 0 0 p4; 0 p2 p3 0; 0 p2 0 p4; 0 0 p3 p4];
%distance for each route
distance = sum(routes,2);
From the above, it can be seen that p2 & p4 would result in the minimum distance combination (5 + 8 is the smallest distance). I could use a brute force for loop to find the minimum distance, but it's not scalable for larger numbers of paths per route. In an attempt to use intlinprog to find the best combination of paths, I'm not understanding what inputs I should use. Referring to the guidlines here, https://www.mathworks.com/help/optim/ug/intlinprog.html, I infer that:
f = ones(1,4);
intcon = 4;
A = [];
b = [];
Aeq = routes;
Beq = distance;
intlinprog(f, intcon, A, b, Aeq, Beq)
I expect this:
ans = [0; 1; 0; 1];
But get this:
ans = [1; 1; 1; 1];
I'm sure I'm missing something key here, but I don't know what. How do I get the first ans above?
Thanks in advance!

Respuesta aceptada

Alan Weiss
Alan Weiss el 7 de En. de 2019
Editada: Alan Weiss el 7 de En. de 2019
Your problem formulation is incorrect in several respects. For example, your Aeq and beq arguments ensure that the solution must be ones(4,1) because they mean
p1*x(1) + p2*x(2) = distance(1)
p1*x(1) + p3*x(3) = distance(2)
p1*x(1) + p4*x(4) = distance(3)
p2*x(2) + p3*x(3) = distance(4)
p2*x(2) + p4*x(4) = distance(5)
p3*x(3) + p4*x(4) = distance(6)
Instead, I suggest that you use the problem-based approach. If your data for path lengths is given in a vector p, then you want a binary vector x with the same length as p and with exactly two nonzero entries. So your problem formulation could be the following:
p = [10,5,12,8]; % put your own vector here
x = optimvar('x',length(p),'Type','integer','LowerBound',0,'UpperBound',1); % binary variable
obj = dot(x,p);
prob = optimproblem('Objective',obj);
cons = sum(x) == 2;
prob.Constraints.cons = cons;
[sol,fval] = solve(prob) % this solution gives x(2) = x(4) = 1, as you want
Of course, for this problem you really just need to take the two smallest entries in the p vector. But I hope that my solution gives you an idea of how to formulate such problems.
Alan Weiss
MATLAB mathematical toolbox documentation
  2 comentarios
Jake Smith
Jake Smith el 7 de En. de 2019
Thanks for the reply. I'll look into making an optimization variable.
On the other hand, if I were to use intlinprog for this problem, how would I do it? I know it's overkill for this application, but I want to understand the inputs for future use.
Alan Weiss
Alan Weiss el 7 de En. de 2019
A direct translation of my previous solution:
p = [10,5,12,8]; % put your own vector here
L = length(p);
Aeq = ones(1,L);
beq = 2;
intcon = 1:L;
lb = zeros(L,1);
ub = ones(L,1);
[x,fval] = intlinprog(p,intcon,[],[],Aeq,beq,lb,ub)
As you see, the problem-based approach is much easier to understand (and debug).
Alan Weiss
MATLAB mathematical toolbox documentation

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Más respuestas (0)

Categorías

Más información sobre Surrogate Optimization en Help Center y File Exchange.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by