Accessing Elements in a 3D matrix using Linear Indexing ?

126 visualizaciones (últimos 30 días)
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to access the individual element of a 3D matrix of size M*N*P using linear indexing?

Respuesta aceptada

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Editada: Bruno Luong el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Given sz = [m,n,p] ans linidx is the linear index of an element, here is one way of computing the subindexes (row, col, page). This works also for generic nd-array.
sz = [m,n,p];
tmp = linidx-1;
nd = max(length(sz),2);
subidx = zeros(1,nd);
for k=1:nd
subk = mod(tmp, sz(k));
subidx(:,k) = subk;
tmp = (tmp-subk) / sz(k);
end
subidx = subidx+1;
You can also see TMW implementation by
>> edit ind2sub

Más respuestas (2)

Image Analyst
Image Analyst el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Yes, it's possible but you'd need 3 dimensions for the linear array, not 2. So not M-by-N but rows-by-columns-by-slice.
[rows, columns, slices] = size(your3DArray);
mask = whatever; % Needs to be a "rows by columns by slices" 3-D array.
your3DArray(mask) = whateverYouWant;
  5 comentarios
Steven Lord
Steven Lord el 11 de Ag. de 2020
You can work backwards.
First, which page contains 20? It can't be the first, because that only contains linear indices 1 through 12. We know this because the size of the array in the first two dimensions is [3 4]. So we know that element 20 is at subscripts (?, ?, 2).
Now we subtract off 12 to find the linear index of the corresponding element in the first page of a matrix. Now we're trying to find the row and column indices in a 3-by-4 matrix corresponding to linear index 8. It can't be in the first column (linear indices 1-3) or the second (4-6) so we know it's in the third column, at (?, 3, 2).
We subtract off 6 to find the linear index of the corresponding element in the first column. This tells us that a linear index of 20 in a 3-by-4-by-2 array corresponds to the element at subscripts (2, 3, 2).
I've done this handwavingly, but you can formalize it using remainders (rem) as ind2sub does.
Venkata Khambhammettu
Venkata Khambhammettu el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Editada: Venkata Khambhammettu el 12 de Ag. de 2020
Thanks Steven. I am pretty much looking at it like you explained to comeup with a mathematical equation to calculate all the sub-indexes.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.


Sudheer Bhimireddy
Sudheer Bhimireddy el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Yes, it is possible. Read this.
A = rand(10,10,10);
B = A(1:2,1:2,1:2); %<- indexing the first two values in all dimensions so it creates a 2x2x2 matrix
C = A(1,1,1); %<- indexing the first value in all dimensions so it points to a single value
  4 comentarios
Image Analyst
Image Analyst el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Not sure how you deduced that. Of course it does work. You just want to know "how MatLab able to use linear indexing to calculate the location of an element in a 3D matrix." and it's in column major order, basically by iterating the left most index first, then the second index, then finally the third index the slowest.
Stephen23
Stephen23 el 11 de Ag. de 2020
Editada: Stephen23 el 11 de Ag. de 2020
"So the concept of Linear Indexing doesn't work for 3D matrices ?"
Of course linear indexing works with 3D arrays, just as the documentation that I linked to clearly states: "Another method for accessing elements of an array is to use only a single index, regardless of the size or dimensions of the array. This method is known as linear indexing" (bold added).
This answer does not show any linear indexing though, so it is unrelated to your question.

Iniciar sesión para comentar.

Categorías

Más información sobre Matrix Indexing en Help Center y File Exchange.

Etiquetas

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by