Oops. I just noticed that I forgot to rename the function from "compareDoubles" (used in Problem 44690) to "compareSingles". Unfortunately I cannot make the fix now without breaking the two successful submissions. Sorry about any confusion. —DIV
Good problem, but it would be better if base-10 or base-2 was adopted as a standard at the description. It is confusing to keep changing them. And the function name should probably be compareSingles and not compareDoubles. You can fix the test suite by using try and catch while accepting both names for the function.
Return the Fibonacci Sequence
Without the French accent please!
Split a string into chunks of specified length
Non-zero bits in 10^n.
Curve fitting (linear functions) & function handles
Just take it easy for a second or two!
Arrange the names in alphabetical order (1)
Curve fitting (non-linear functions) & function handles
Seemingly impossible problem
Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: .
You can also select a web site from the following list:
Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location.
Contact your local office