This example shows how to tune a compensator using automated
tuning methods in **Control System Designer**.

To select an automated tuning method, in **Control System Designer**, click
**Tuning Methods**.

Select one of the following tuning methods:

`PID Tuning`

— Tune PID gains to balance performance and robustness or use classical tuning formulas.`Optimization Based Tuning`

— Optimize compensator parameters using design requirements implemented in graphical tuning and analysis plots (requires Simulink^{®}Design Optimization™ software).`LQG Synthesis`

— Design a full-order stabilizing feedback controller as a linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) tracker.`Loop Shaping`

— Find a full-order stabilizing feedback controller with a specified open-loop bandwidth or shape (requires Robust Control Toolbox™ software).`Internal Model Control (IMC) Tuning`

— Obtain a full-order stabilizing feedback controller using the IMC design method.

In the dialog box for your selected tuning method, in the
**Compensator** section, select the compensator and loop to
tune.

**Compensator**— Select a compensator to tune from the drop-down list. The app displays the current compensator transfer function.**Select Loop to Tune**— Select an existing open-loop transfer function to tune from the drop-down list. You can select any open-loop transfer function from the**Data Browser**that includes the selected compensator in series**Add New Loop**— Create a new loop to tune. In the Open-Loop Transfer Function dialog box, select signals and loop openings to configure the loop transfer function.

For optimization-based tuning, you do not specify the compensator and loop to tune in this way. Instead, you define the compensator structure and select compensator and prefilter parameters to optimize. For more information, see Select Tunable Compensator Elements (Simulink Design Optimization).

Using **Control System Designer**, you can automatically tune any of the
following PID controller types:

P — Proportional-only control

I — Integral-only control

PI — Proportional-integral control

PD — Proportional-derivative control

PDF — Proportional-derivative control with a low-pass filter on the derivative term

PID — Proportional-integral-derivative control

PIDF — Proportional-integral-derivative control with a low-pass filter on the derivative term

To open the PID Tuning dialog box, in **Control System Designer**, click
**Tuning Methods**, and select **PID
Tuning**.

The robust response time algorithm automatically tunes PID parameters to balance performance and robustness. Using the robust response time method, you can:

Tune all parameters for any type of PID controller.

Design for plants that are stable, unstable, or integrating.

To tune your compensator using this method:

In the PID Tuning dialog box, in the

**Specifications**section, in the**Tuning method**drop-down list, select`Robust response time`

.Select a

**Controller type**. If you choose**PD**or**PID**, check**Design with first order derivative filter**to design a PDF or PIDF controller, respectively.### Tip

Adding derivative action to the controller gives the algorithm more freedom to achieve both adequate phase margin and faster response time.

In the

**Design mode**drop-down list, select one of the following:`Time`

— Specify controller performance using time-domain parameters.**Response Time**— Specify a faster or slower controller response time. To modify the response time by a factor of ten, use the left or right arrows.**Transient Behavior**— Specify the controller transient behavior. You can make the controller more aggressive at disturbance rejection or more robust against plant uncertainty.

`Frequency`

— Specify controller performance using frequency-domain parameters.**Bandwidth**— Specify the closed-loop bandwidth of the control system. To produce a faster response time, increase the bandwidth. To modify the bandwidth by a factor of ten, use the left or right arrows.**Phase Margin**— Specify a target phase margin for the system. To reduce overshoot and create a more robust controller, increase the phase margin.

To apply the specified controller design to the selected compensator, click

**Update Compensator**.### Note

If you previously specified the controller structure manually or using a different automated tuning method, that structure is lost when you click

**Update Compensator**.By default, the app automatically computes controller parameters for balanced performance and robustness. To revert to these default parameters at any time, click

**Reset Parameters**.

You can use classical PID design formulas to tune P, PI, PID, and PIDF controllers. These design formulas:

Require a stable or integrating plant. For more information about the effective plant seen by the compensator, see Effective Plant for Tuning.

Cannot tune the derivative filter. If you select a PIDF controller, the classical design methods set the filter time constant to

*Td*/10, where*Td*is the tuned derivative time.

To tune your compensator using a classical method:

In the PID Tuning dialog box, in the

**Specifications**section, in the**Tuning method**drop-down list, select`Classical design formulas`

.Select a

**Controller type**.### Tip

Adding derivative action to the compensator gives the algorithm more freedom to achieve both adequate phase margin and faster response time.

In the

**Formula**drop-down list, select a classical design formula.`Approximate MIGO frequency response`

— Compute controller parameters using closed-loop, frequency-domain, approximate M-constrained integral gain optimization (see [1]).`Approximate MIGO step response`

— Compute controller parameters using open-loop, time-domain, approximate M-constrained integral gain optimization (see [1]).`Chien-Hrones-Reswick`

— Approximate the plant as a first-order model with a time delay, and compute PID parameters using a Chien-Hrones-Reswick lookup table for 0% overshoot and disturbance rejection (see [2]).`Skogestad IMC`

— Approximate the plant as a first-order model with a time delay, and compute PID parameters using Skogestad design rules (see [3]).### Note

This method is different from selecting Internal Model Control Tuning as the full-order compensator tuning method.

`Ziegler-Nichols frequency response`

— Compute controller parameters from a Ziegler-Nichols lookup table, based on the ultimate gain and frequency of the system (see [2]).`Ziegler-Nichols step response`

— Approximate the plant as a first-order model with a time delay, and compute PID parameters using the Ziegler-Nichols design method (see [2]).

Apply the specified controller design to the selected compensator. Click

**Update Compensator**.### Note

If you previously specified the controller structure manually or using a different automated tuning method, that structure is lost when you click

**Update Compensator**.

Optimization-based tuning is available only if you have Simulink Design Optimization software installed. You can use this method to design control systems for LTI models by optimizing controller parameters.

Optimization-based tuning only changes the values of controller parameters and not the controller structure itself. For information on adding or removing compensator elements, see Edit Compensator Dynamics.

To design a controller using optimization-based tuning:

Define the structure of the compensators you want to tune. Typically, you design an initial controller either manually or using a different automated tuning method.

Open the Response Optimization dialog box. In

**Control System Designer**, click**Tuning Methods**, and select**Optimization-Based Tuning**.Select compensator parameters to optimize. On the

**Compensators**tab, in the**Optimize**column, select the compensator elements to tune.You can optimize elements for any compensator listed in the

**Data Browser**. To select all elements for a given compensator, select the check box that corresponds to that compensator.Any elements that you do not select in the

**Optimize**column remain at their current values during optimization.For each compensator element, specify:

**Initial guess**— Starting point for the optimization algorithm. To use the current element**Value**as the**Initial guess**, click a row in the table, and click**Use Value as Initial guess**.**Minimum**and**Maximum**bounds on the element value. The optimization constrains the search results to the specified range.**Typical value**scaling factor for normalizing the compensator elements.

On the

**Design Requirements**tab, in the**Optimize**column, select the design requirements to satisfy during optimization.Each design requirement is associated with a plot of a specific response in the

**Data Browser**. To select all requirements for a given response, select the corresponding check box.For information on adding and editing design requirements, see Design Requirements.

(optional) Configure optimization options. On the

**Optimization**tab, click**Optimization options**.Click

**Start Optimization**.

For examples of optimization-based tuning, see Optimize LTI System to Meet Frequency-Domain Requirements (Simulink Design Optimization) and Design Optimization-Based PID Controller for Linearized Simulink Model (GUI) (Simulink Design Optimization).

Linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) control is a technique for designing optimal dynamic regulators and setpoint trackers. This technique allows you to trade off performance and control effort, and to take into account process disturbances and measurement noise.

LQG synthesis generates a full-order feedback controller that guarantees closed-loop stability. The designed controller contains an integrator, which guarantees zero steady-state error for plants without a free differentiator.

To design an LQG controller:

Open the LQG Synthesis dialog box. In

**Control System Designer**, click**Tuning Methods**, and select**LQG Synthesis**.Specify the transient behavior of the controller using the

**Controller response**slider. You can make the controller more aggressive at disturbance rejection or more robust against plant uncertainty. If you believe your model is accurate and that the manipulated variable has a large enough range, an aggressive controller is preferable.Specify an estimate of the level of output measurement noise for your application using the

**Measurement noise**slider. To produce a more robust controller, specify a larger noise estimate.Specify your controller order preference using the

**Desired controller order**slider. The maximum controller order is dependent on the effective plant dynamics.Apply the specified controller design to the selected compensator. Click

**Update Compensator**.### Note

If you previously specified the controller structure manually or using a different automated tuning method, that structure is lost when you click

**Update Compensator**.

For an example of LQG synthesis using **Control System Designer**, see
Design LQG Tracker Using Control System Designer.

If you have Robust Control
Toolbox software installed, you can use loop shaping to design SISO
compensators in **Control System Designer**. Loop shaping generates a
stabilizing feedback controller to match, as closely as possible, a target loop
shape. You can specify this loop shape as a bandwidth or an open-loop frequency
response.

To design a controller using loop shaping:

Open the Loop Shaping dialog box. In

**Control System Designer**, click**Tuning Methods**, and select**Loop Shaping**.Select one of the following tuning preferences:

**Target bandwidth**— Specify a**Target open-loop bandwidth**, $${\omega}_{b}$$, to produce a loop shape of the specified bandwidth over an integrator, $$\frac{{\omega}_{b}}{s}$$.**Target loop shape**— Specify the**Target open-loop shape**as a`tf`

,`ss`

, or`zpk`

object. To limit the frequencies over which to match the target loop shape, specify the**Frequency range for loop shaping**as a two-element row vector.

Specify your controller order preference using the

**Desired controller order**slider. The maximum controller order is dependent on the effective plant dynamics.Apply the specified controller design to the selected compensator. Click

**Update Compensator**.### Note

**Update Compensator**.

Internal model control (IMC) uses a predictive model of the plant dynamics to compute control actions. IMC design generates a full-order feedback controller that guarantees closed-loop stability when there is no model error. The tuned compensator also contains an integrator, which guarantees zero steady-state offset for plants without a free differentiator. You can use this tuning method for both stable and unstable plants.

To design an IMC controller:

Select and configure the IMC control architecture. In

**Control System Designer**, click**Edit Architecture**.In the Edit Architecture dialog box, select the fifth control architecture, and import the plant model,

**G1**, predictive model,**G2**, and disturbance model**Gd**.Click

**OK**.Open the Internal Model Control (IMC) Tuning dialog box. In

**Control System Designer**, click**Tuning Methods**, and select**Internal Model Control (IMC) Tuning**.Specify a

**Dominant closed-loop time constant**. The default value is 5% of the open-loop settling time. In general, increasing this value slows down the closed-loop system and makes it more robust.Specify your controller order preference using the

**Desired controller order**slider. The maximum controller order is dependent on the effective plant dynamics.Apply the specified controller design to the selected compensator. Click

**Update Compensator**.### Note

**Update Compensator**.

For an example of IMC tuning, see Design Internal Model Controller for Chemical Reactor Plant.

[1] Åström, K. J. and Hägglund, T. “Replacing
the Ziegler-Nichols Tuning Rules.” Chapter 7 in *Advanced PID
Control*, Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrumentation, Systems, and
Automation Society, 2006, pp. 233–270.

[2] Åström, K. J. and Hägglund, T.
“Ziegler-Nichols' and Related Methods.” Section 6.2 in
*Advanced PID Control*, Research Triangle Park, NC:
Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, 2006, pp. 167–176.

[3] Skogestad, S., “Simple analytic rules for model
reduction and PID controller tuning.” *Journal of Process
Control*, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2003, pp. 291–309.